New Zealand immigration policy changes

The changes to immigration family policies will help New Zealand attract and retain skilled migrants, and ensure that family migrants can settle well and are self-sufficient.
New Zealand faces growing global competition for migrants with the skills we need to grow our economy. Being able to sponsor your parents to live here is important to help attract and retain skilled migrants. As a result of these policy changes, many skilled migrants who wish to sponsor their parents for residence here will experience a swifter decision and less bureaucratic criteria. This will give New Zealand a competitive advantage in the international hunt for these highly skilled workers.

These immigration policy changes will also help ensure we are attracting family migrants who are self-sufficient and can settle well. The door will still be open to parents of other migrants but their applications will not be prioritised.

Key changes are as follows:
Parent Category
Parents will be prioritised:
who either have a guaranteed minimum income, or bring funds with them, so are better able to support themselves, or
whose adult children earn enough to support their parents without any need for taxpayer assistance.
Parents with poor English will continue to be eligible but they must purchase English language tuition to help them to settle well in New Zealand.
Background
Sponsored parents help maintain family and cultural linkages but most (87 percent of parents surveyed after 18 months residence in New Zealand) are not in paid employment.

Around 3,500 – 4,000 parents are approved for residence each year.
Sibling and Adult Children Category
The Sibling and Adult Child Category will close because it does not generate sufficient economic benefit for New Zealand.
Background
Only 66 percent of sponsored siblings and adult children interviewed 18 months after gaining residence had jobs, despite a job offer for ongoing and sustainable work being required to gain residence.
Residence requirements for young adult children
The Dependent Child Category and associated residence requirements will be amended.

The criteria are being relaxed so that young adult children aged 18 to 20 may be eligible for residence – even if they have a job in their home country – provided they are single, have no children and are included, or were declared, in their parents’ residence application.

Previously adult children in that age group were not able to be included in their parents’ residence application if they had a job in their home country.

Those aged 21 to 24 will still only be eligible to migrate if they can show that they are financially dependent.
Changes to the sponsorship period
Sponsorship includes a responsibility on the New Zealand sponsor to ensure the sponsored person has accommodation and maintenance for a specified time while in New Zealand. Sponsors are also responsible for the costs of outward travel (if repatriation or deportation is required).

The sponsorship term for parents will initially remain at five years, but the Government has decided it will amend the Immigration Act 2009 at some time in the future to extend the sponsorship term for family-sponsored migrants to 10 years.

The timing for this amendment has not been decided.

Find out more call a lawyer at Auckland law firm Quay Law – Contact an Auckland Lawyer

Chinese keen to bring their riches to NZ

Source: NZ Herald

Reporter : Lincoln Tan

New Zealand has a strong appeal for rich Chinese people who want to move here as investor migrants. Two have been granted conditional residencies after investing more than $10 million each in “approved investments” and 43 others – more than from any other country – are waiting to be granted approval or have received approval in principle to transfer more than $1.5 million each. Acting head of Immigration Jan Clark says the department has also given approval to a third Chinese investor to transfer money. Immigration Minister Jonathan Coleman said the business migration scheme had attracted $416 million of potential investment capital to New Zealand. So far, more than $102 million has been transferred and invested here and $133 million has been approved for funds transfer. Applications worth another $181 million are being processed. “We developed a policy package that makes New Zealand very attractive to business migrants, and they’re staking their confidence in New Zealand at a time of difficult international financial conditions,” Dr Coleman said. When the scheme was introduced, many would-be investors from China claimed Immigration’s recognition of money transfers only through the banking system was blocking them from investing in New Zealand because of China’s strict money transfer rules. A licensed immigration adviser said the two successful investor applicants had transferred their money through Hong Kong to get around the rules. “Their nominated funds are in Hong Kong, and it is easy enough to use the Hong Kong banking system to transfer the money here,” said the adviser, who did not want to be named. He was advising his other Chinese clients to use similar means to move their money if they wanted to apply for New Zealand residency. “It’s a bit of a hassle and takes longer, it’s a pathway they can use,” he said. “For example, the Chinese can buy properties in Hong Kong, liquidate the funds and then transfer the money over.” However, the New Zealand Association for Migration and Investment advocacy and policy chairman Jimmy Lee said New Zealand’s business migration policy still discriminated against the Chinese. The association has made a written submission to the Department of Labour, which oversees Immigration, asking it to review its business migration policies. “From the Immigration figures, we know the Chinese hold the key to how successful the policy will be,” Mr Lee said. “There should be a total review of the business migration policies if the Government is serious about wanting more investor migrants.” Immigration adviser Ming Tiang, who runs Chiwi Immigration Services, says he has at least 10 Chinese clients, with between $1.5 million and $10 million to invest, who could not meet Immigration’s “bank transfer only” requirement.

INVESTOR 1 ($10 million+ investors)

Number of applications approved by country

  • 2 – China, US
  • 1 – Finland, UK, Singapore, South Korea

INVESTOR 2

($1.5 million+ investors)

  • 9 – US
  • 2 – UK
  • 1 – Japan, Singapore, South Africa

APPLICANTS

Approved in principle/under process (top three countries)

  • 43 – China
  •  35 – UK
  • 19 – US

Source: Immigration New Zealand

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,540 other followers